Conformal Low Power Verification with CPF Training
Date | Version | Country | Location | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scheduled upon demandOn demand | EXPRESS INTERESTINQUIRE |
Version | Region | |
---|---|---|
24.1 | Online | ENROLL |
23.1 | Online | ENROLL |
Other Versions | Online | EXPRESS INTERESTINQUIRE |
Length: 1 Day (8 hours)
Become Cadence Certified
Course Description
In this course, you learn to verify low-power designs using Conformal® Low-Power Verification. In the labs, you debug practical examples of common power format (CPF) violations, functional and structural violations, and nonequivalences.
Learning Objectives
After completing this course, you will be able to:
- Identify features of the Conformal Low-Power software
- Identify the flows for low-power verification
- Identify power intent support in the Conformal Low-Power software
- Apply low-power checks on gate netlists with corresponding power intent
- Apply low-power checks on physical netlists with corresponding power intent
- Run low-power equivalency checks in different stages along with the supplied power intent
Software Used in This Course
- Conformal Low Power XL
Software Release(s)
CONFRML241
Modules in this Course
- Overview
- Preparation and Setup
- Power Intent Support
- Synthesis Verification
- Physical Verification
- Using Conformal Low-Power Effectively
Audience
- ASIC Designers
- Design Engineers
- Digital IC Designers
- FPGA Designers
- Hardware Engineers
- Logic Designers
Prerequisites
You must have experience with or knowledge of the following:
- Have a basic understanding of Verilog language and constructs
- Have a basic understanding of one of the three CPF power intent format
- Completed the Logic Equivalence Checking with Conformal course or
- Have equivalent experience with the Conformal Equivalence Checker tool
Or you must have completed the following courses:
Related Courses
Please see course learning maps at this link for a visual representation of courses and course relationships. Regional course catalogs may be viewed here.

"I enjoyed the course. The materials and labs are well structured and informative. The trainer had very well-grounded knowledge about the topic. I liked working with the labs. By doing the exercises I became familiar with the tool."
Matthias Steffen, Infineon Technologies

“A good training with a very well experienced and open trainer in a good environment."
Roger van Hoof, u-blox

"Good training, excellent. I liked the interaction with the instructor."
Leonardo Affortunati, NXP Semiconductors

“Good course. Good instructor."
Alexey Ozadskov, RC Module