Home > Community > Forums > PCB Design > Extra routing room by suppressing pads

Email

* Required Fields

Recipients email * (separate multiple addresses with commas)

Your name *

Your email *

Message *

Contact Us

* Required Fields
First Name *

Last Name *

Email *

Company / Institution *

Comments: *

 Extra routing room by suppressing pads 

Last post Tue, Mar 7 2006 6:18 AM by archive. 3 replies.
Started by archive 07 Mar 2006 06:18 AM. Topic has 3 replies and 741 views
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)
Sort Posts:
  • Tue, Mar 7 2006 6:18 AM

    • archive
    • Top 75 Contributor
    • Joined on Fri, Jul 4 2008
    • Posts 88
    • Points 4,930
    Extra routing room by suppressing pads Reply

    I'm laying out a 16-layer board that calls for unused pads to be suppressed on layers 3-14.  I'm accomplishing this by using the "Internal Layer - optional" checkbox in Padstack Editor and the "suppress unconnected pads" checkbox in the Manufacture-Artwork dialog in Allegro.  What I would like to do is use the extra room given by suppressing the unused pads for routing.  Is there a way to only show the used pads during routing?  Ideas of how this could be done (but I don't know how to implement any of them) include turning each pad on or off by layer (labor intensive), setting all pads "off" until connected on a particular layer (or starting with a small pad and then oversize the pad if a connection is made) or somehow backannotating from the gerber files.

    It seems a big waste to have all that extra room to go unused.  Thanks in advance for your help.  I'm using version 15.2.

    brian


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by brianh
    • Post Points: 0
  • Tue, Mar 7 2006 12:19 PM

    • archive
    • Top 75 Contributor
    • Joined on Fri, Jul 4 2008
    • Posts 88
    • Points 4,930
    RE: Extra routing room by suppressing pads Reply

    The pads will be put out only at gerber level.
    But for me, triyng to use the "extra" space" left by removing pads is not a great idea:
    you will have issues in order to manufacture the board (you wil be to close of holes)


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by jcteyssier
    • Post Points: 0
  • Wed, Mar 8 2006 2:59 AM

    • archive
    • Top 75 Contributor
    • Joined on Fri, Jul 4 2008
    • Posts 88
    • Points 4,930
    RE: Extra routing room by suppressing pads Reply

    one way is 2 use different physical and spacing types (e.g. pwr for all power net) and define padstacks only for these types with inner layer pad sizes equal to the drill
    make all copper to pwr spacinging on all layers equal to the fab drill to copper requirements (0.2-0.25mm being most common) and assign the pwr types to have precidence over all other types.


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by GigaDyne
    • Post Points: 0
  • Thu, Apr 20 2006 2:19 PM

    • archive
    • Top 75 Contributor
    • Joined on Fri, Jul 4 2008
    • Posts 88
    • Points 4,930
    RE: Extra routing room by suppressing pads Reply

    That's only for gerber level, but not for layout , can you take advantage of the rest room? I think that's impossible,


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by Alex1202
    • Post Points: 0
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)
Sort Posts:
Started by archive at 07 Mar 2006 06:18 AM. Topic has 3 replies.