Home > Community > Forums > Functional Verification > Engine for IFV

Email

* Required Fields

Recipients email * (separate multiple addresses with commas)

Your name *

Your email *

Message *

Contact Us

* Required Fields
First Name *

Last Name *

Email *

Company / Institution *

Comments: *

 Engine for IFV 

Last post Fri, Jun 7 2013 5:25 AM by Buvna. 3 replies.
Started by Buvna 06 Jun 2013 05:35 AM. Topic has 3 replies and 736 views
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)
Sort Posts:
  • Thu, Jun 6 2013 5:35 AM

    • Buvna
    • Top 500 Contributor
    • Joined on Fri, May 31 2013
    • Posts 19
    • Points 245
    Engine for IFV Reply

    Hey, 

    The automatic assertions take a very large time to run as my design is huge.

    Could anyone tell me which is the best engine to use so that I can fasten this process?

    Thanks.

    Filed under:
    • Post Points: 20
  • Thu, Jun 6 2013 8:38 AM

    • ckomar
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Thu, Jul 17 2008
    • Phoenix, AZ
    • Posts 11
    • Points 100
    Re: Engine for IFV Reply

    Hi Buvna,

     This is probably less likely about engine and more about tool version and running in parallel.  Are you using the latest 12.2 software?  In more recent versions there have been optimizations on running the automatic checks.  In addition are you running your job with parallel distribution? This is the most effective way to increase throughput. Please refer to the "Setting up Distributed Resource Manager (DRM)" in the IFV user guide for more info.

    Chris 

    • Post Points: 20
  • Thu, Jun 6 2013 9:20 AM

    • Buvna
    • Top 500 Contributor
    • Joined on Fri, May 31 2013
    • Posts 19
    • Points 245
    Re: Engine for IFV Reply

    I'm not using the latest version. But I'm running with parallel distribution.

    I will try with the 12.2 software.

    Thanks. 

    • Post Points: 5
  • Fri, Jun 7 2013 5:25 AM

    • Buvna
    • Top 500 Contributor
    • Joined on Fri, May 31 2013
    • Posts 19
    • Points 245
    Re: Engine for IFV Reply

    I switched to the 12.2 version. It says 17 - maximum jobs that will run for thr current DRM, engine and halo settings.

    Is this good enough for parallel? Or can I make it better?

    I've used: define engine auto_dist

    Thanks,

    Bhuvana

    • Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)
Sort Posts:
Started by Buvna at 06 Jun 2013 05:35 AM. Topic has 3 replies.