Home > Community > Forums > Custom IC SKILL > letGetContactRule(), leGetContactParam(), letGetContactNameArray() in IC615?

Email

* Required Fields

Recipients email * (separate multiple addresses with commas)

Your name *

Your email *

Message *

Contact Us

* Required Fields
First Name *

Last Name *

Email *

Company / Institution *

Comments: *

 letGetContactRule(), leGetContactParam(), letGetContactNameArray() in IC615? 

Last post Thu, May 16 2013 2:15 AM by Andrew Beckett. 1 replies.
Started by danmc 13 May 2013 01:07 PM. Topic has 1 replies and 474 views
Page 1 of 1 (2 items)
Sort Posts:
  • Mon, May 13 2013 1:07 PM

    • danmc
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Fri, Apr 19 2013
    • Posts 13
    • Points 200
    letGetContactRule(), leGetContactParam(), letGetContactNameArray() in IC615? Reply

    Are there equivalents of these functions in IC615?  I have some custom code which was developed in IC5 that uses these functions to get information like via width/height/rows/columns, etc.

     Thanks

    -Dan

     

    • Post Points: 20
  • Thu, May 16 2013 2:15 AM

    Re: letGetContactRule(), leGetContactParam(), letGetContactNameArray() in IC615? Reply

    Dan,

    Not direct equivalents, but assuming you have a variable tfId with the techFile id in, you can do:

    leGetContactNameArray:   tfId~>viaDefs~>name
    leGetContactParam: not really a direct replacement - you can look at the code in this post to see how to mess with the parameters of a via and find the values of a via instance.
    leGetContactRule: as above

    The problem is that vias are very differently handled in OA compared with CDB (in CDB they were just instances, whereas vias in OA are separate objects, and don't require (for standard vias) a cellView master to represent them).

    It might be best to contact customer support so that we can look at your custom code and advise how best to adapt it for IC615?

    Regards,

    Andrew.

    • Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (2 items)
Sort Posts:
Started by danmc at 13 May 2013 01:07 PM. Topic has 1 replies.