Home > Community > Tags > e/Coverage-Driven Verification/Functional Verification
 
Login with a Cadence account.
Not a member yet?
Create a permanent login account to make interactions with Cadence more conveniennt.

Register | Membership benefits
Get email delivery of the Cadence blog (individual posts).
 

Email

* Required Fields

Recipients email * (separate multiple addresses with commas)

Your name *

Your email *

Message *

Contact Us

* Required Fields
First Name *

Last Name *

Email *

Company / Institution *

Comments: *

e,Coverage-Driven Verification,Functional Verification

  • e Templates: A Nifty Way To Create Reusable Code

    Hi All, An e template (known as a parameterized type in other programming languages) is a feature that has been around for several releases and can be a great way of creating re-usable code. Templates can be used anywhere a user would like to create a single re-useable object that might operate on different...
    Posted to Functional Verification (Weblog) by teamspecman on Tue, Aug 10 2010
  • UVM - 10 Years in the Making ...

    In case you the missed the news today, the Accellera VIP TSC released the first version of the Universal Verification Methodology (UVM). This represents a significant achievement on the part of the TSC as it is the first standard SystemVerilog Base-Class Library and Methodology. While there has been...
    Posted to Functional Verification (Weblog) by mstellfox on Mon, May 17 2010
  • Yikes - Synopsys is Following Me!

    No, I'm not being paranoid -- Synopsys, my largest competitor, is literally following me: Before discoursing on this unusually public display of affection, allow me to take a step back and announce that I've started to tweet on Twitter . While initially put off by the apparent solipsism embedded...
    Posted to Functional Verification (Weblog) by jvh3 on Mon, Jun 29 2009
  • Grey-Boxed Data-Path Approach Using 'when sub-typing'

    [Please join Team Specman in welcoming the first guest blogger from our user base: Ms. Kaberi Banerjee, a senior design & verification engineer based in Silicon Valley California] Fellow Specmaniacs (or should I say "specmites" – in alignment with the subject of bugs!), I recently...
    Posted to Functional Verification (Weblog) by teamspecman on Wed, Feb 18 2009
  • "...Yes, Virginia there is a Specman"

    I usually try to visit many of our customers in Europe (and other parts of the world) at least a couple of times a year. On my last trip in October, while I was in Stockholm, I ended up having beers at a pub with one of our local AEs and a Specman customer. This customer had been telling me about all...
    Posted to Functional Verification (Weblog) by mstellfox on Mon, Feb 2 2009
  • "ClubT" Newsletter Issue #3 Just Posted

    Specmaniacs and Other Trailblazers, The latest edition of the 'ClubT ' newsletter is now posted here , and once again there is exciting news around e , Specman, and Verification. Articles include: * Have you heard of OVM e ? * Incisive 8.2 Technology Update * Verification IP Portfolio E-x-p-a...
    Posted to Functional Verification (Weblog) by teamspecman on Tue, Jan 27 2009
  • A Look Back On 2008 (Before Hazarding Predictions for 2009)

    Before I dare take a stab at adding to the many predictions already made for 2009 (like those in EE Times and SCD Source ), allow me to share with you some of the main verification technology-specific observations that the "Trailblazer" team saw in 2008: 1 billion logic gate chip roadmaps As...
    Posted to Functional Verification (Weblog) by jvh3 on Wed, Jan 7 2009
  • Metric-Driven Verification in a Box...

    In my last few posts, I was explaining our focus here in Cadence Verification on creating the OVM to enable an industry wide VIP eco-system, and trying to make verification more of a closed-loop process with our metric-driven verification methodology. In case you missed the announcement about expanding...
    Posted to Functional Verification (Weblog) by mstellfox on Mon, Dec 29 2008
  • Quickly Create and Manage e Functional Coverage

    As a verification engineer, I have always found creating coverage code to be one of the more time consuming tasks to actually execute on for two reasons: 1. While the general process of coverage creation is conceptually simple; in practice, actually figuring out what to can turn out to be more difficult...
    Posted to Functional Verification (Weblog) by teamspecman on Thu, Dec 18 2008
  • New e / Specman Workshops Available Now

    In response to the continual growth in the e /Specman user community, Team Specman has put together 3 new workshops that are included with the Incisive 8.2 SOCV Kit that shipped just last week. (Plus: to ensure the content stays fresh, the "plan of record" for these workshops is to continually...
    Posted to Functional Verification (Weblog) by teamspecman on Wed, Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 2 (11 items) 1 2 Next >