will be under maintenance from Friday, Oct. 3rd at 6pm (PST) thru Sunday, Oct 5th at 11pm (PST). login, registration, community posting and commenting functionalities will be disabled.
Home > Community > Tags > Monte Carlo simulation/ADEXL
Login with a Cadence account.
Not a member yet?
Create a permanent login account to make interactions with Cadence more convenient.

Register | Membership benefits
Get email delivery of the Cadence blog (individual posts).


* Required Fields

Recipients email * (separate multiple addresses with commas)

Your name *

Your email *

Message *

Contact Us

* Required Fields
First Name *

Last Name *

Email *

Company / Institution *

Comments: *

Monte Carlo simulation,ADEXL

  • Monte carlo analysis

    sir i am ,, using IC 5.10.40 in cadence , ,, I want to make monte carlo analysis for my circuit , but my seniors here are telling that monte carlo is not working here in the version ,, how can i check that ?.. i am just beginer , please reply ,,
    Posted to RF Design (Forum) by rakesh reddy on Thu, Mar 20 2014
  • spectre nested sweep in MC run fails to "export" expression

    Here is my netlist(analysis part of.., produced from ADEXL): ________________________________________________________________________________________ simulatorOptions options reltol=1e-3 vabstol=1e-6 iabstol=1e-12 temp=70 \ tnom=27 homotopy=dptran scalem=1.0 scale=1.0 gmin=1e-12 rforce=1 \ maxnotes=5...
    Posted to Custom IC Design (Forum) by kxlux on Tue, Aug 20 2013
  • Re: ADEXL and Montecarlo : 'global' PSF file creation

    Hi Andrew, thanks for your super-prompt reply :) However, I was not clear enough: in my outputs setup, there are signals and expression which are 'working'. For these, I can see the mean/sigma current values and even plot the partial results (histogram) if I want. However, next to those, I also...
    Posted to RF Design (Forum) by MicheleA on Thu, Apr 4 2013
  • ADEXL and Montecarlo : 'global' PSF file creation

    Hi all, I have a *very long* MC run which is taking far more than expected. It simulated some 1000 points already and I would like to examine the results. Unfortunately (for a reason that escapes me) the most important parameter is an expression working for normal sweeps but not for MC. Therefore I cannot...
    Posted to RF Design (Forum) by MicheleA on Thu, Apr 4 2013
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)