Cadence.com will be under maintenance from Friday, Oct. 3rd at 6pm (PST) thru Sunday, Oct 5th at 11pm (PST).
Cadence.com login, registration, community posting and commenting functionalities will be disabled.
Home > Community > Tags > Monte Carlo simulation/ADEXL
 
Login with a Cadence account.
Not a member yet?
Create a permanent login account to make interactions with Cadence more convenient.

Register | Membership benefits
Get email delivery of the Cadence blog (individual posts).
 

Email

* Required Fields

Recipients email * (separate multiple addresses with commas)

Your name *

Your email *

Message *

Contact Us

* Required Fields
First Name *

Last Name *

Email *

Company / Institution *

Comments: *

Monte Carlo simulation,ADEXL

  • Monte carlo analysis

    sir i am ,, using IC 5.10.40 in cadence , ,, I want to make monte carlo analysis for my circuit , but my seniors here are telling that monte carlo is not working here in the version ,, how can i check that ?.. i am just beginer , please reply ,,
    Posted to RF Design (Forum) by rakesh reddy on Thu, Mar 20 2014
  • spectre nested sweep in MC run fails to "export" expression

    Here is my netlist(analysis part of.., produced from ADEXL): ________________________________________________________________________________________ simulatorOptions options reltol=1e-3 vabstol=1e-6 iabstol=1e-12 temp=70 \ tnom=27 homotopy=dptran scalem=1.0 scale=1.0 gmin=1e-12 rforce=1 \ maxnotes=5...
    Posted to Custom IC Design (Forum) by kxlux on Tue, Aug 20 2013
  • Re: ADEXL and Montecarlo : 'global' PSF file creation

    Hi Andrew, thanks for your super-prompt reply :) However, I was not clear enough: in my outputs setup, there are signals and expression which are 'working'. For these, I can see the mean/sigma current values and even plot the partial results (histogram) if I want. However, next to those, I also...
    Posted to RF Design (Forum) by MicheleA on Thu, Apr 4 2013
  • ADEXL and Montecarlo : 'global' PSF file creation

    Hi all, I have a *very long* MC run which is taking far more than expected. It simulated some 1000 points already and I would like to examine the results. Unfortunately (for a reason that escapes me) the most important parameter is an expression working for normal sweeps but not for MC. Therefore I cannot...
    Posted to RF Design (Forum) by MicheleA on Thu, Apr 4 2013
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)