Home > Community > Forums > Digital Implementation > loadViolationReport for calibre NG

Email
* Required Fields

Recipients email * (separate multiple addresses with commas)

Your name *

Your email *

Message *

Contact Us

Cadence Contacts

Global Office Locator
Find Offices worldwide »

Sales Inquiry
Request for Product information »
Cadence Channel Partners »

Corporate Headquarters
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
2655 Seely Avenue
San Jose, CA 95134
Phone: 408.943.1234
* Required Fields
First Name *

Last Name *

Email *

Company / Institution *

Comments: *

 loadViolationReport for calibre NG 

Last post Tue, Apr 4 2006 8:01 PM by archive. 3 replies.
Started by archive 04 Apr 2006 08:01 PM. Topic has 3 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)
Sort Posts:

  • Tue, Apr 4 2006 8:01 PM

    • archive
    • Top 75 Contributor
    • Joined on Fri, Jul 4 2008
    • Posts 88
    • Points 4,740
    loadViolationReport for calibre NG Reply

    HI ,
    can any once suggest me how to overcome or load calibre DRC violations on to Soce  "4.2.2"
     older version is OK (4.1)  no problem .

    cmd used :

    loadViolationReport -type  Calibre -filename calibre.err

    it reports as can't read "designName": no such variable

    thanks in advice .


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by mohanch007
    • Post Points: 0

  • Mon, Apr 10 2006 12:04 PM

    • archive
    • Top 75 Contributor
    • Joined on Fri, Jul 4 2008
    • Posts 88
    • Points 4,740
    RE: loadViolationReport for calibre NG Reply

    Hello,

    The proper syntax for loadViolationReport is "loadViolationReport -type -filename .

    The first line in calibre.err file should be,

    The deisgn name could be the name of the design/block for which the calibre was run. Units are GDSII units usually set to 1000.

    In your case, you are missing this line. Hence the error. Hope this helps this issue. You may also want to try running “PVS” which is Cadence solution for DRC. PVS reads Calibre rule deck verbatim and generates output in Calibre format.

    Regards,

    Elvis


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by elvis
    • Post Points: 0

  • Mon, Apr 10 2006 6:19 PM

    • archive
    • Top 75 Contributor
    • Joined on Fri, Jul 4 2008
    • Posts 88
    • Points 4,740
    RE: loadViolationReport for calibre NG Reply

    Dear Elvis,
    Thanks for your comment,
    As you have specified the syntax is similar to which i have specified , (syntax is correct but only -type is calibre as i`m using calibre error report )
     FYI. *(loadViolationReport -type -filename )

    And the first line in calibre.err file contains design name and units :
    (TOP_CHIP 1000 ) , I confirm you that the line is existing in the file.

    One more thing the same syntax and same file is used on Soce  (4.1) and reported correctly and displayed violation markers.
    But my concern is the new Soce version i.e (4.2.2)
     [First Encounter v04.20-s383_1 ] its not working ,

    any comments ??


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by mohanch007
    • Post Points: 0

  • Sun, Apr 16 2006 9:00 PM

    • archive
    • Top 75 Contributor
    • Joined on Fri, Jul 4 2008
    • Posts 88
    • Points 4,740
    RE: loadViolationReport for calibre NG Reply

    Dear Elvis,
    I could able to find the work around for Soce 4.2 "loadViolationReport " .
    the limitations of Soce is the top cell  (design name ) should not start with character "C" or "N" ,
    As my design name is starting with "C" ( C***) . causing Error .

    Regards,
    Mohan Ch


    Posted By mohanch007 on 4/10/2006 6:19 PM
    Dear Elvis,
    Thanks for your comment,
    As you have specified the syntax is similar to which i have specified , (syntax is correct but only -type is calibre as i`m using calibre error report )
     FYI. *(loadViolationReport -type -filename )

    And the first line in calibre.err file contains design name and units :
    (TOP_CHIP 1000 ) , I confirm you that the line is existing in the file.

    One more thing the same syntax and same file is used on Soce  (4.1) and reported correctly and displayed violation markers.
    But my concern is the new Soce version i.e (4.2.2)
     [First Encounter v04.20-s383_1 ] its not working ,

    any comments ??



    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by mohanch007
    • Post Points: 0
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)
Sort Posts:
Started by archive at 04 Apr 2006 08:01 PM. Topic has 3 replies.