Home > Community > Blogs > Low Power > error detection for controlled voltage sources and voltage scaling
 
Login with a Cadence account.
Not a member yet?
Create a permanent login account to make interactions with Cadence more convenient.

Register | Membership benefits
Get email delivery of the Low Power blog (individual posts).
 

Email

* Required Fields

Recipients email * (separate multiple addresses with commas)

Your name *

Your email *

Message *

Contact Us

* Required Fields
First Name *

Last Name *

Email *

Company / Institution *

Comments: *

Error Detection for Controlled Voltage Sources and Voltage Scaling

Comments(0)Filed under: low-power, power, low power, PSO, voltage, shutoff, MSV, AVS, power-aware, CPF, DVFS, LDO, adaptive, Dynamic power, scaling, RNM, PVT, wreal, frequency

This posting is part of a series of blogs on dynamic power management in digital-centric mixed-signal verification environments. In this post, I will cover error detection.

My previous blogs covered some of the following topics:

1. Basics of dynamic power management
2. Very brief introduction to RNM (Real Number Modeling) for efficient simulation of mixed signal SoCs
3. How to create a controlled voltage source using a Specman testbench
4. Closed-loop voltage scaling
5. Simulation of closed-loop adaptive voltage scaling

Previous postings include:

Controlled voltage source error detection

You may have a situation where a tightly controlled voltage source is created in the testbench, and noise is injected in the form of IR drop, switching and other noise sources. The level of noise is carefully controlled as test stimulus.

A noisy voltage source such as a battery supply that varies over time, and also drifts with temperature and use, can be created as shown in Figure 1. Error conditions like low and dead battery need to detected and tracked as seen in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Controlled Voltage Source with error detection

Voltage scaling error detection

The fundamental task of any verification exercise is the detection of errors. In this example, randomly generated noise is injected into the regulated output of the LDOs to emulate the effects of switching noise and IR drop on voltage of each power domain. This results in glitches, some of which occur close to the transitions of the nominal voltages of a given power domain, thus causing faulty voltage transitions.

It is important to detect glitches larger than a specified size and duration. Checkers are put in place to detect these. Any time these conditions are violated, the entire power domain is corrupted, as shown in Figure 2.

Errors are also detected by creating mixed-signal assertions that track expected behavior across the digital/analog boundary.

 
Figure 2: Voltage scaling error detection

In the next blog, I will talk about Analog coverage and metrics.

Stay tuned for more...

Neyaz

 

Comments(0)

Leave a Comment


Name
E-mail (will not be published)
Comment
 I have read and agree to the Terms of use and Community Guidelines.
Community Guidelines
The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.