Cadence.com will be under maintenance from Friday, Oct. 3rd at 6pm (PST) thru Sunday, Oct 5th at 11pm (PST).
Cadence.com login, registration, community posting and commenting functionalities will be disabled.
Home > Community > Blogs > Industry Insights > uvm ms extending metric driven verification to analog ip and mixed signal socs
 
Login with a Cadence account.
Not a member yet?
Create a permanent login account to make interactions with Cadence more convenient.

Register | Membership benefits
Get email delivery of the Industry Insights blog (individual posts).
 

Email

* Required Fields

Recipients email * (separate multiple addresses with commas)

Your name *

Your email *

Message *

Contact Us

* Required Fields
First Name *

Last Name *

Email *

Company / Institution *

Comments: *

UVM-MS – Metric-Driven Verification for Analog IP and Mixed-Signal SoCs

Comments(0)Filed under: Industry Insights, DVCon, Accellera, Analog, verification, Mixed-Signal, mixed signal, Metric-driven verification, UVM, Analog Simulation, MDV, UVM 1.0, analog/mixed-signal, coverage, UVM-MS, analog IP

Metric-driven verification and constrained-random stimulus generation have greatly eased digital functional verification, but have rarely been applied to analog IP or mixed-signal SoCs. That may change with a proposed methodology called Universal Verification Methodology-Mixed Signal (UVM-MS), which will be described in a DVCon paper March 1 presented by Cadence and LSI Corp.

UVM 1.0 is an emerging verification interoperability standard that is soon to be released by Accellera. The Cadence/LSI work on mixed-signal metric-driven verification started with the Open Verification Methodology (OVM), which was the basis of UVM. An SoC Realization track paper at CDNLive! Silicon Valley last year, OVM-Based Verification of Analog IP and Mixed-Signal SoCs, offered a preview of what will be presented this year at DVCon.

The DVCon paper, titled UVM-MS: Metrics Driven Verification of Mixed Signal Designs, is authored by Neyaz Khan and Yaron Kashai of Cadence and Hao Fang of LSI Corp.  I recently talked to Neyaz and Yaron to learn more.

Metric-Driven for Analog

Metric-driven verification (MDV) provides a systematic approach to verification that captures intent with an executable verification plan (vPlan), automatically generates test stimulus, and tracks the progress of verification through coverage metrics. This makes it possible to determine when high-quality verification closure has been achieved. An MDV diagram is shown below.

,

So why apply this approach to analog/mixed-signal? Neyaz noted that the analog content of SoCs is growing, and that the quality of verification has become a concern, especially at the interfaces between analog and digital. "There has been a lot of progress in the past 10-15 years in applying MDV to the digital side, but nothing like that has happened on the analog side," he noted.

The UVM-MS methodology primarily concerns functional coverage, which can provide measurements of parameters such as frequency and gain. For example, you may be looking at a variable gain amplifier and trying to verify that the output gain matches the spec.   After generating stimulus to test the amplifier by sweeping the input frequency over the allowed range, you can then use functional coverage metrics along with automated checkers to make sure that the desired range of the gain has been completely tested.

To allow analog functional coverage, the methodology uses the e language to create "signal ports" that sample analog parameters. Due to some limitations in SystemVerilog, the UVM-MS methodology is currently based on e, but the long-term goal is to work with SystemVerilog, Neyaz said. While Cadence offered MDV well before UVM, the new methodology leverages UVM because of its broad vendor acceptance as an industry standard.

Supporting Existing Styles

Analog simulation is traditionally interactive and slow, while digital is batch and fast - how can designers bridge that gap? The UVM-MS methodology supports all analog modeling styles including Spice, Verilog-AMS, and real number models, allowing a speed-versus-accuracy tradeoff.  Low-level analog operations are facilitated by a Verilog-AMS layer that runs underneath the hardware verification language code.  A library of components supports commonly used interfaces between analog signals and testbench functions.

The overall verification methodology, Yaron said, "is pretty much the same as doing MDV with digital, but certain things need to be done to facilitate the integration with analog. The model has to be tied to the testbench in a certain way. One has to structure the verification environment slightly differently for analog design. You need to instantiate some of these [digital] blocks to talk to analog ports and drive some analog signals."

Neyaz noted that the methodology does require teams to invest more effort in analog IP verification. "Keeping in mind that the IP is designed once and used in multiple chips, having high quality IP is a very good investment," he said. The paper details how a current design from LSI Corp. was used for proof of concept.

The DVCon paper is part of session 3.4, which starts at 8:30 am Tuesday March 1 at the DoubleTree Hotel in San Jose, Calif. Conference registration is available at the DVCon web site.

Richard Goering

Comments(0)

Leave a Comment


Name
E-mail (will not be published)
Comment
 I have read and agree to the Terms of use and Community Guidelines.
Community Guidelines
The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.