Home > Community > Blogs > Industry Insights > whitepaper 3d ics pose design challenges but no showstoppers
Login with a Cadence account.
Not a member yet?
Create a permanent login account to make interactions with Cadence more convenient.

Register | Membership benefits
Get email delivery of the Industry Insights blog (individual posts).


* Required Fields

Recipients email * (separate multiple addresses with commas)

Your name *

Your email *

Message *

Contact Us

* Required Fields
First Name *

Last Name *

Email *

Company / Institution *

Comments: *

Whitepaper: 3D ICs Pose Design Challenges, But No “Showstoppers”

Comments(0)Filed under: Industry Insights, TSVs, 3D ICs, 3D, Silicon Realization, floorplanning, test, 3DIC, system-level, RTI, 3D IC, 3D-IC, whitepaper, IC/package co-design, pathfinding

3D ICs with through-silicon vias (TSVs) promise tremendous power, cost, and size advantages, but they also generate a lot of concern about what's required in terms of design flows, skills, and tools. A new Cadence whitepaper (click here to read) sets the record straight by taking a balanced look at design challenges and requirements for 3D ICs with TSVs. The whitepaper will be distributed at the RTI 3D IC conference Dec. 8-10 in Burlingame, California.

The whitepaper notes that there is no need for a new, revolutionary, 3D IC-specific design system. But there are new challenges, such as thermal management in multi-die stacks, new layout requirements, and the impact of TSVs on active devices. As a result, new capabilities are needed in such areas as system-level exploration, floorplanning, place and route, extraction and analysis, design for test, and IC/package co-design.

But first, what is a "3D IC?" Multichip modules, systems-in-package (SiPs), and stacked memory die implementations have been around for some time. What's new is the stacking of heterogeneous elements (analog, digital, and logic in addition to memory) and the use of TSVs through active layers. Eventually we will see multiple-die devices that look like this:


More specifically, here are some of the key requirements:

  • System Level Exploration (or "Pathfinding") will be needed to help users partition designs into separate chips, select the appropriate silicon technology for each chip, determine where functionality goes, choose the best die order in the stack, and optimize connectivity between chips.
  • 3D Floorplanning (x, y and z directions) will help users determine where micro-bumps and TSVs should be placed so the system is optimized in terms of timing, power and heat dissipation.
  • Implementation concerns include the placement and optimization of TSV landing pads, flip-chip co-design with the package, and signal routing across the multiple die.
  • Extraction and Analysis tools are needed to manage power, heat, and signal integrity in 3D stacks. Thermal analysis and management is particularly important in stacked die implementations.
  • Test raises many challenges for 3D ICs, including access to die inside a stack and proper handling of thinned wafers. Both new standards and tool support are required.
  • Silicon/Package Co-Design is needed to provide planning and analysis between the silicon die and the package and the board.

Because 3D IC design is multi-disciplinary, a comprehensive solution is needed. It must include early estimation and analysis, digital IC implementation and analysis, analog/mixed-signal implementation, IC/package co-design, and PCB design. 3D IC design also needs a Silicon Realization flow. EDA360 Silicon Realization brings in three capabilities - unified design intent, abstraction, and convergence with physical and manufacturing data. A successful 3D IC design environment will capture design intent up front, support abstraction with early estimation and floorplanning, and achieve convergence through test, implementation, extraction, analysis, and packaging.

Returning to the focus of my previous 3D IC blog post, the real issue is not so much technology issues as cost reduction. 3D ICs will never move to the mainstream unless they can be designed and manufactured in a cost-effective and timely way. No semiconductor company will adopt 3D ICs because the technology is "cool" (even though it is). They'll adopt the technology to make money. Design tools and flows must make that possible.

Richard Goering



Leave a Comment

E-mail (will not be published)
 I have read and agree to the Terms of use and Community Guidelines.
Community Guidelines
The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.