Home > Community > Blogs > Functional Verification > esc and quot booth centric quot vs quot paper centric quot shows
 
Login with a Cadence account.
Not a member yet?
Create a permanent login account to make interactions with Cadence more conveniennt.

Register | Membership benefits
Get email delivery of the Functional Verification blog (individual posts).
 

Email

* Required Fields

Recipients email * (separate multiple addresses with commas)

Your name *

Your email *

Message *

Contact Us

* Required Fields
First Name *

Last Name *

Email *

Company / Institution *

Comments: *

ESC and "Booth-Centric" vs. "Paper Centric" Shows

Comments(0)Filed under: Functional Verification, DAC, CDNLive, events, DVcon, ESC

Last Wednesday I walked the floor of the Embedded Systems Conference (ESC), with the added bonus of catching the panel discussion on "Who's Taking Over Whom - Is EDA moving Into Embedded or Embedded into EDA" supported by Mac (a/k/a Michael McNamara). While this panel was very engaging, (check out fellow blogger Steve Brown's account here), instead of blogging about the panel I've been inspired to step back and consider the marketing trade craft of the show itself.  Let me explain: when I first stepped onto the show floor, and surveyed the sea of booths and their various charms, out of the blue I recalled a request from blogger JL Gray last summer, when he stated "I'd much rather see the marketing guys write a separate blog on their experiences in marketing".

Hence, in the "spirit of marketing", I invite you to consider the following categories of industry events:

"Booth-centric" shows
* Definition: The exposition is the main focal point of the event
* Examples: ESC, DAC

and

"Paper centric" shows
* Definition: The presentation and discussion of technical papers are the central driver of the show
* Examples: DVCon, CDNLive


Of course, both types of shows have overlapping features like keynote speakers, expert panel discussions, technical papers & workshops, etc.  However, I trust the distinction between the formats -- and attendee expectations (i.e. "I'm going to [show XYZ] see a lot of vendor's wares in one convenient place" vs. "I'm going to [conference ABC] hear a lot of technical papers in a short period of time" -- is clear.

Before I discourse on the relative status and merits of these two, admittedly overly  simplified categories, allow me to ask the reader the following overly simplified survey question:

Which type of event do you prefer in general?
a) Booth-centric events (like ESC or DAC)
b) Paper-centric events (like DVCon or CDNLive)
c) Neither - physical shows are obsolete in the Internet age
d) Other

[[[ Click here to register an answer ]]]


For the purposes of this question, assume that:
* travel budget and other worldy constraints are not an issue
* the events themselves are of equally high quality and/or are best-in-class

If you are unsure of your answer, I recommend skimming this very good ESC-inspired commentary in last Friday's EET on "Meeting with the unexpected" by Junko Yoshida, and see if you are influenced by her ode to conferences.

Until next time, "vote early and vote often" ...

Joe Hupcey III

 

Comments(0)

Leave a Comment


Name
E-mail (will not be published)
Comment
 I have read and agree to the Terms of use and Community Guidelines.
Community Guidelines
The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.