Home > Community > Blogs > Functional Verification > functional verification more important than ever in 2009
 
Login with a Cadence account.
Not a member yet?
Create a permanent login account to make interactions with Cadence more conveniennt.

Register | Membership benefits
Get email delivery of the Functional Verification blog (individual posts).
 

Email

* Required Fields

Recipients email * (separate multiple addresses with commas)

Your name *

Your email *

Message *

Contact Us

* Required Fields
First Name *

Last Name *

Email *

Company / Institution *

Comments: *

Functional Verification More Important than Ever in 2009?

Comments(1)Filed under: Functional Verification, Formal Analysis, Coverage-Driven Verification, metric driven verification (MDV), coverage driven verification (CDV), OVM 2.0

Here in Cadence Product Marketing, we're still recovering from our very busy annual sales conference last week. Of course, I can't say much about what transpired there but I do want to comment that functional verification was a hot topic. In my many conversations with our field team, two trends were clear.

The first is that customers just can't afford to re-spin chips in the current economic climate. With the cost of deep submicron mask sets running so high, even a single re-spin can be a project/product killer, or truly a company-killer for a startup. Naturally, this puts even more emphasis on all forms of verification to achieve first-pass silicon success.

My second observation is that the ongoing trend of having to do more with fewer resources is accelerating. It's no secret that most of our customers are not growing right now, and many have in fact reduced their staffs. A lot of the functional verification advances in the last ten years involve greater automation and play directly to this situation. Customers simply can't hire armies of verification engineers to hand-write tests anymore. Instead, they write assertions and let formal tools do most of the work at the block and subsystem levels, then leverage OVM-based constrained-random testbenches to do most of the work at the chip and system levels. Of course, these approaches rely on high-quality metrics that expose verification holes and measure verification completeness.

So I returned from the event with the strong feeling that verification will be more important than ever this year. What do you think? Am I suffering from tunnel vision since I spend most of my time in this space, or are you also seeing functional verification looming large in your near future? Any comments are most welcome!

Tom A.

Comments(1)

By James Colgan on January 26, 2009
It makes tremendous sense that automation at any point in the development process should be in high demand given the current economic climate.  Verification has long been trending to become the most resource intensive area - almost equal and sometimes surpassing design in the number of engineers allocated.   As always, seeing is believing when it comes to understanding how much automation can accelerate verification.  Which is why we're eagerly anticipating the opening of the Cadence MIPI Verification Online Lab over on Xuropa: www.xuropa.com.  In this Online Lab engineers can use the Incisive Verification environment with a MIPI VIP and see first hand what automation can do to help them in their work.

Leave a Comment


Name
E-mail (will not be published)
Comment
 I have read and agree to the Terms of use and Community Guidelines.
Community Guidelines
The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.